Bargaining Continues March 17

Yesterday, the faculty bargaining team invited the CEC to join us back to the table today and tomorrow (see attached letter) with no preconditions, and they have agreed to meet on Thursday.  Both parties will meet on Thursday to attempt to reach a negotiated settlement prior to the strike deadline at 12.01am Friday, March 18.   As we indicated in our invitation, if real progress is being made, then we are willing to extend the strike deadline.  

Letter to CEC – March 15, 2022

Further to our update yesterday, and following additional consultation with our legal team, we have also included the memo from the Treasury Board to the CEC regarding our workload proposals (see attached).  As we stated in our reply (see below), it is clear that the CEC greatly misrepresents the Treasury Board’s views concerning the application of Bill 124 to our workload proposals. The Treasury Board never characterized our proposals as illegal. It is also clear that the information they provided to the Treasury Board does not accurately describe the application of the collective agreement provisions regulating workload and their effect on compensation.

Memo from Treasury Board to CEC 
 
We will keep you posted on further developments or changes.

In solidarity,
JP, Jonathan, Katie, Michelle, Ravi, Rebecca, Shawn
Your CAATA Bargaining Team

Response to CEC’s Latest Communication

We have forwarded the CEC’s latest communication, and the actual statement from the Treasury Board, to our legal team for review.  Neither was ever presented to us before being made public, and this is the first we’ve seen it.  The faculty bargaining team, and to our knowledge, OPSEU/SEFPO, were not consulted by the Treasury Board (TB) prior to this communication being issued.

It is important to note that the TB does NOT say that our proposals are illegal; it says that, based on the information they were provided by CEC CEO Graham Lloyd with no context, that the proposals COULD potentially violate Bill 124 IF his representation of them were accurate.  That is very different than our proposals being illegal on their face.  Please note as well that the TB suggests that the CEC get independent legal advice–the TB communication is NOT a legal decision; this is an opinion based on information solely supplied by the CEC and not OPSEU/SEFPO, and information which has not been shared with us or our members.  

According to our understanding of the law, the TB only decides the legality of Collective Agreements or settlements, not individual proposals tabled in the course of bargaining.  Further, they require input from both sides before issuing a decision.  This is a heavy-handed CEC tactic designed to confuse and obfuscate.  It is deliberately timed to demoralize our members.  Frankly, it is gross and an overreach. It misrepresents the content from the TB, and is in keeping with the CEC’s aggressive but not entirely truthful communications.

Sincerely,
JP Hornick
Chair, CAAT-A Bargaining Team